I’ll admit, and you should be honest, who isn’t excited now that they’re understanding why it was important for google to buy youtube? I’m excited, that’s for sure. This whole Viacom vs Youtube thing could never have ended well in the old days, which isn’t to say that it will now, but it couldn’t be any worse than youtube going at it alone. They just didn’t have the resources to fight such an important battle. Now that google is involved with all its internet pressence and deep pockets, we can watch this thing unfold for years to come. What we ought to hope for, or at least what I hope for, is that by the time any sort of final decision is made, it won’t matter. But loads and loads of money will still have been burned. Woohoo! That’s great for someone. Not sure who, though.
To be fair, I’m not a huge fan of Youtube. Not to imply that I’ve never made use of the service to host a home video, but I haven’t been able to get into the countless hours of wandering through pointless videos. It’s not the same as wandering through countless hours of pointless web pages. (Countable hours are much preferred.)
Again, to be fair, I’m not entirely against Viacom. I understand their want for protecting their copyrighted content. The stuff that brings in the money. (That other stuff.)
So let’s revisit this in a few years and see if there’s been any progress. I think for now we should focus on how and where all this content is distributed, rather than what the content actually is. Heck, there will always be content. Whether or not it’s worthwhile, that’s a million other opinions. Let’s all say, “billions of handhelds, millions of users, thusands of data centers.” Think about that cloud and smoke it up.