Tag Archives: Cellphones

AT&T Buys Free WiFi Hot Spots

This morning, AT&T announced that it will buy Waypoint, Inc . to the tune of $275 million (all cash, baby) thereby expanding AT&T’s network of free WiFi hot spots across the US.  A response to the increased number of WiFi enabled smart phones hitting the market and the continued cost burden to the 3G network, which is losing AT&T money

AT&T’s 3G network has been hit hard with loads of people using iPhones, Blackberries, and other smart phones for data and voice, as opposed to just voice.  This inundation of data use (to browse Facebook, check email, Twitter, or upload photos and stream video) has forced AT&T to realize the value of opening a free WiFi networked infrastructure.  AT&T customers carrying a WiFi enabled hand held can jump onto one of AT&T’s hot spots, which they just expanded by 10,000 locations by agreeing to purchase Waypoint, Inc., and surf the web at WiFi speeds which are much faster than 3G speeds.  Hopefully, this will reduce the burden to the 3G network and save AT&T some money.

The major hindrance being that WiFi has a relatively limited range, so unless you’re sitting in the coffee house, at the McDonald’s, or near enough to any of the other now 20,000 US locations, you’re probably not going to offload too much of the 3G burden.  Although, maybe a little less burden is just enough to keep 3G working for now.  At least until 4G comes along.

The added Waypoint locations also benefit AT&T’s DSL subscribers, who can use their WiFi enabled laptops at any of these hot spots.

AT&T Buys Free WiFi Hot Spots

This morning, AT&T announced that it will buy Waypoint, Inc . to the tune of $275 million (all cash, baby) thereby expanding AT&T’s network of free WiFi hot spots across the US.  A response to the increased number of WiFi enabled smart phones hitting the market and the continued cost burden to the 3G network, which is losing AT&T money

AT&T’s 3G network has been hit hard with loads of people using iPhones, Blackberries, and other smart phones for data and voice, as opposed to just voice.  This inundation of data use (to browse Facebook, check email, Twitter, or upload photos and stream video) has forced AT&T to realize the value of opening a free WiFi networked infrastructure.  AT&T customers carrying a WiFi enabled hand held can jump onto one of AT&T’s hot spots, which they just expanded by 10,000 locations by agreeing to purchase Waypoint, Inc., and surf the web at WiFi speeds which are much faster than 3G speeds.  Hopefully, this will reduce the burden to the 3G network and save AT&T some money.

The major hindrance being that WiFi has a relatively limited range, so unless you’re sitting in the coffee house, at the McDonald’s, or near enough to any of the other now 20,000 US locations, you’re probably not going to offload too much of the 3G burden.  Although, maybe a little less burden is just enough to keep 3G working for now.  At least until 4G comes along.

The added Waypoint locations also benefit AT&T’s DSL subscribers, who can use their WiFi enabled laptops at any of these hot spots.

White Space Use Changes Everything — Thanks, FCC

On Novemember 4, 2008, while most folks in America were celebrating the conclusion of an historical election, some of us (name call how you like) were busy celebrating the FCC’s unanimous "yes" vote to open White Spaces to unlicensed or lightly licensed personal devices.  While this is not exactly the same band of frequencies as those included in the 19.6 billion-dollar auction of the 700MHZ band that took place earlier this year, it does stem from the same place — the February 2009 mandated digital conversion of broadcast TV, resulting in the release of the non-contiguous spectrum from 54mhz to 806MHZ. This recent FCC vote and news has to do with the sub-700MHZ portion that has not been auctioned.

White Space is what?

It’s fast, long-range, wireless broadband within an existing and established infrastructure.  Without getting into too many technical specifics, the White Space in question is the unused portion of the spectrum between the channels from 54MHZ to 698MHZ (everything below what was auctioned).  Each white space being about 1MHZ wide, capable of transmitting voice and data at speeds between 10mbs to 20mb per channel.  (Probably faster.)  Has a range measured in miles, and goes through most physical objects with little signal loss or degradation.

Interesting Interested Conglomerates

The major proponent, of course, being Google, who provided its White Space proposal to the FCC shortly after the 700MHZ auction closed in March. Thinking they’d already secured one open access avenue for their then upcoming mobile G1 cellphone, they smartly figured it would be a good idea to secure a second open access avenue with equal capabilities.  Google partnered with a variety of companies to move their plan forward, including tech giants Dell, Motorola, and Microsoft.  Mr. Gates himself made a lobbying appearance late in October to fight for their cause.

Not surprisingly, the major opponents of the FCC’s decision are content creators like ABC, CBS, and NBC, and those groups who provide distribution conduits for existing content, like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T.  None of these groups want more competition getting into your living room or with providing wireless, mobile service.  They have control and, reasonably so, they want to keep it.  So they’re going to fight this FCC decision as best they can at whatever cost.

Problems For a Crowded Spectrum

Because this is the space between licensed spaces already in use, opponents argue that an unlimited, or uncountable, amount of unlicensed devices will generate too much interference with their already licensed devices, resulting in disruption to their existing services. (For example, Radio or TV microphones and cameras at live sporting events could be disrupted by too many personal portable devices at the event causing havoc on the spectrum.)

Except this is a weak argument because the FCC outlined in their standards that personal devices are required to sense nearby licensed streams and then shutdown if they are too close.  So, in theory, portable device could turn off while you’re at the game.  Although, it would seem this is unlikely to happen, as devices could easily switch to an alternate channel in the lower band, or potentially switch to a channel in the open upper band, much like devices can do now between Edge or 3G.  Not to mention the FCC also dictates that devices will not be released that have any risk of interfering with other signals.

End User Impacts

Big players with Big stacks of cash are fighting to maintain, or gain, control of how we all speed into the next era of information exchange and interactivity.  It will move across the Internet to your hand held devices where ever you are, or across the Internet into each room of your house.  You’ll no longer be dependent on Comcast, Verizon, or AT&T to get you voice and data connections.  You’ll no longer be dependent on ABC, CBS, and NBC to provide you content.  You’ll no longer be limited to crippled devices with limited function because of bad multi-year contracts.

Why This Must Happen

High-speed.  Long-range.  Existing infrastructure.  Accessibility.  Cost.  Open standards.  Wireless!  The white space currently goes unused, which is a waste of a valuable resource.  With an open, high-speed, wireless network, any user with a piece of hardware running compliant software can access the network and use the Internet.  The user’s cost to access the world wide web will diminish as hardware costs decrease, software is freely given away, and advertisers adapt.  Much like network television, the costs are covered by funds earmarked for marketing.  Everyone will have equal access to the same information at an amazing rate.

The best content (TV, movies, music, multi-media), the best services (video chat, phone chat, instant messaging, email, to do lists, content management, word processing, etc.), the best of everything else I can’t think of, will be on the Internet available to everyone at exactly the same time in exactly the same way, and so it will be for everyone to decide what’s good and what works.

The power is shifting, and I need more space!

###

Mobile Mania, Which New Cell Phone To Buy?

There’s a lot going on in the mobile world these days.  Big names want our attention, and they’re hard pressed to keep it for more than the two seconds it takes for the next best mobile thing to arrive.  Well, not quite that quick, but you get the idea.  The latest addition to the group is the much talked about, supposedly highly anticipated,  Android from Google.  Which technically isn’t a cell phone but the software used by the cell phone.  A minor detail.

Research In Motion continues to dominate the enterprise world with its Blackberrys; Apple’s hanging with the cool kids on the corner sporting iPhones; and I think there are a couple others, but their names elude me.  Which is to say, who cares about Nokia and Microsoft?  Although, Nokia does offer a worthy alternative with its N95.  Still, no one is talking about Nokia.

There’s more to it than just a bunch of big hitters stepping up to the plate with new gadgets, we also have to consider what’s tied to these phones when it comes time to get one.  The iPhone is stuck to AT&T at the moment, but has an awesome Apps Store.  Google is stuck to T-Mobile and HTC (for now, at least), but is offering an open platform for cell phones which includes Chrome.  RIM isn’t stuck to any of the carriers, but they’re losing hype and recently decided to partner with Microsoft.  (Microsoft’s way of staying relevant in the mobile world, by offering its services via RIM’s Blackberry.)  All these groups see web use moving to your hand held device and they want in on the action. You definitely see it in the geek world with more and more web services offering mobile apps or SMS connectivity, but so far only the geeks are really using mobile services like Twitter or BrightKite.

Whether or not there’s a real demand for this much competition in the smart phone world remains to be seen, but for those of us fascinated with new tech toys, we’re enjoying the show and anxious to see where all this is going.  What will be the ultimate deciding factor, and is there one?  Applications?  Network speed?  Device performance?  Or really slick design?  If I had to guess, for most people, it’s being able to make a call.

Leave your number after the hash.

###

California Bans Hands-Free Driving, Effective July 1st

I think it means you’re no longer allowed to drive and use the mobile phone at the same time _unless_ you have one of those fancy hands-free devices which is, supposedly, meant to keep you from becoming too distracted from the high-priority task of safely operating the vehicle for which you’re sitting behind the wheel.  Imagine that!  Safety first?  The nerve of these California law makers.  How dare they pass SB1613.

Seriously, though, the powers at hand have made a weak attempt to improve the safety for Californians on the road.  “Why?”, you ask.  How bout this:

  • The base fine for the FIRST offense is $20 and $50 for subsequent convictions. With the addition of penalty assessments, the fines can be more than triple the base fine amount. Egads, batman!  More than triple?  What’s that, like $75?  Ha!  $20 is laughable for a first offense.  Not to mention, what are the odds you’ll get hit twice with this charge?  Hardly a deterrent.
  • The new law does not prohibit dialing, but drivers are strongly urged not to dial while driving. “Strongly urged”?  It would seem more attention is required to dial than to talk.
  • The law does not specifically prohibit [text messaging], but an officer can pull over and issue a citation to a driver of any age if, in the officer’s opinion, the driver was distracted and not operating the vehicle safely. Sending text messages while driving is unsafe at any speed and is strongly discouraged.  Again with the “strongly urged.”  I don’t get it.  Does anyone actually care about safety on the road?

This is all equivalent to having done nothing.  Someone should tell these law-makers that mobile computing is growing, it’s growing fast, and it’s going to be in all our cars via our cell phones.  Anyone who can sell you something on the Internet is trying to figure out how to sell it to you on your phone.  Forget about talking, text messaging is more distracting while driving.  (Who has time to watch the road when he’s busy replying to @JustinLL on Twitter?)  And tomorrow’s drivers are the biggest users, as they’re the ones growing up with 24/7 interconnection to mobile friends and marketers.

I hope local law enforcement agencies come out strong enforcing the law and its penalties.  However, it’s also bothersome that valuable resources are being wasted dealing with this issue.

On a similar note, SB33, which prevents drivers under the age of 18 from using a cell phone at all, also goes into effect July 1, 2008.

Read more about both new laws at the California DMV’s frequently asked questions.

Drive Safely.  It’s usually the other driver’s fault.

SMS Tax? Not 3jam!

How strange, that on the same day I come across an article in the local Sacramento newspaper indicating local government is considering a tax on text messaging, I also find myself knee deep in the latest SMS tech?  It’s called 3jam.  (Thanks Techcrunch.)  The whole thing is oddly curious.  But curiously odd?  It’s not.

I’ll be the first to admit I’m not a huge fan of the text message, be it SMS or MMS.  My biggest qualm being a general degradation of the English language form.  Which, if you’re keeping up, should seem kind of ridiculous —  I Twitter and Plurk.  Both services limiting input to 140 characters.  (What is it with that number?)

To be fair, the tax doesn’t really bother me.  The article claims there would be a reduction to my tax on the land line I keep.  Yea!  Some balance.  But the real reason is, I don’t do a ton of texting (verb?).  I typically distribute my GrandCentral phone number and it doesn’t allow for SMS or MMS.  (I’m saved.)

So far as I can tell, this tax is limited to the Sacramento area, so if you’re local, you might want to get involved in the November fourth election.

But even if you’re going to get taxed, the great feature of 3jam is that it only registers one text message regardless of how many folks you send the same message to.   (I can send a message to all two of my friends and only be charged for the price of one message.  Then, if either recipient replies to said message, it will go to every person on the original message list and only result in the cost of one message being sent for the sender.  It probably makes more sense if you have more than two friends.)

Good luck.

Apple iPhone Next Point Ooooh

I’ll admit, and let’s be honest, I’m not going to buy a new cellphone (any cellphone), and not because I don’t like what the Apple’s cooked, but because I don’t really want to spend money on gadgety nonsense.  I’ll be saving my drinking money for other things, like drinking and cab rides.  Get a grip, my man.

But while we’re here, let’s take a second to point out at least two of the new features on the next Apple iPhone that might actually make it a viable option for someone other than ane iTards.  (ooops.  just kidding.)  Those two features, of course, being support for 3G and GPS.  Now neither of these features is absolutely necessary for our corporate users, but what does come in handy is that AT&T is charging a higher price for the business plan.  I think that’s awesome.  (Man, you’re all over the place. I  know, better tag this one wandering.)

Like I was saying, the press releases say something about working with business email.  I’m not really sure what that means, and perhaps by the time we get around to reading this post there will be some clarifying information released on the matter.  In the meanwhile, I’ll continue to use my silly-ass blackberry with all its beautiful google plug-ins.  (Again, I don’t really need any of these features.  But the camera is great for collecting dust on a lens if you don’t have anywhere else to store your pocket dust…or lint.)

I think Mr. Steve Jobs did a great thing here trying to help the economy.  The product is reasonably priced and widely followed.  If only it’d been released before everyone blew through their stimulus checks.  But, fret not!  People will still spend.  I’d spend, if I were into the damn thing.  It’s neat, to say the least.  But I after what Thompology has said to me about the 3G network, I can’t fully support it.  I’m still waiting strong for the 700Mhz spectrum to have a thing done to it.

Enough.

it finally ended…on Tuesday

I’ve been meaning to write about this all week, but for this or that reason, I’ve forgotten to address it. And that’s the ending of FCC auction 73, the bid for the beloved 700mhz spectrum. Apparently the only unsold portion is the D-block, which was the portion to be shared with the government for emergency broadcasting. Yesterday slashdot was running a forum about why this portion went unsold. But I say, "who cares." We care about the real winners, the winners who collectively bid some nineteen plus billion to forever change the way we use our mobile communicative technologies. Where the heck is my google android phone?

The top bidders have yet to be released. At least not as of the time of my writing this.